Invited Review
Primary Spinal Tumors – A Review
Mohit Patel, MD Department of Neurological Surgery University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Cleveland, OH
Rohit Mauria, MD Department of Neurological Surgery University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Cleveland, OH
Manish K. Kasliwal, MD, MCh, FAANS Department of Neurological Surgery University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Cleveland, OH
Introduction
Primary spinal tumors (PSTs) are a rare etiology spine surgeons encounter. Compared to the 90,000 new cases of spinal metastasis diagnosed yearly, only 7,500 new cases of PSTs are seen.¹ The incidence of PSTs is about 2.5 to 8.5 cases per 100,000 persons per year.¹,² In comparison, incidences of other spinal pathologies, such as lumbar stenosis and cervical radiculopathy, are estimated at 300 and 83 cases per 100,000 per year, respectively.¹ Erlemann et al noted that more than 90% of the PSTs found in the first decade of life are benign compared to fewer than 10% in the seventh decade.³ Additionally, PSTs are more common in men.¹,² Finally, benign PSTs usually involve the posterior elements of the spine, while malignant PSTs involved the anterior column; however, this rule has exceptions.¹,² Prior to reviewing specifics, a brief overview of clinical presentation and workup is in order. Nocturnal back pain is the most consistent presenting sign in patients with PSTs.¹,³ Other symptoms may include pain without overt trauma due to a potential pathological fracture and myelopathy due to spinal cord compression.1,2,4 Neurological deficits are noted in 55% of the patients with malignant PSTs.⁵ Some primary spinal tumors, such as sacral chordomas may present with symptoms, such as rectal dysfunction or constipation.⁶ Primary workup for PSTs should include both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis should also be completed to evaluate for potential metastasis.²
If clinical presentation and imaging suggest a PST, the next step is a core needle biopsy sample. Compared to the 23% accuracy rate of fine needle aspiration biopsy for PSTs, a core needle biopsy has an 89% overall diagnostic accuracy.2,7 The biopsy tract should be marked so it can be removed if surgery is performed.8 Finally, based on the clinical, radiological, and histological findings, the tumor staging is a critical step in diagnosis. Of note, the Enneking classification, developed in 1986, is still commonly applied to staging of PSTs.2 Components of the Enneking system include grading of the tumor based on histology, local extension of the lesion, and metastases (Table 1).2,42 The classification does not address the tumor's epidural extension or the patient’s neurological status. Additionally, Weinstein, Boriani, and Biagini published the WBB classification in which the vertebra was divided into 12 zones and five layers to assist with surgical planning.2,9 A study by the Spine Oncology Study Group found a near-perfect intra-observer reliability using the Enneking and WBB classifications.10
Table 1. Enneking Staging System
Source: Adapted from Enneking WF. A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms.⁴²
The goal of the surgery is to attain a surgical resection following the Enneking principles while trying to maintain a good neurological outcome. Fisher et al showed that patients who underwent Enneking inappropriate resections compared to Enneking appropriate resections had higher rates of local recurrence and mortality with an odds ratio of 4.69.¹¹ (Enneking appropriate resection is surgical resection following the Enneking principles.)
Relevant Primary Spine Tumors
1. Hemangioma
Hemangiomas are benign intraosseous vascular lesions involving the vertebral body. They represent 30% of primary spinal tumors.¹ These lesions are often diagnosed incidentally.¹² In up to 11% of autopsies, spinal hemangiomas are incidentally found.13,14 These lesions are seen in the fourth to sixth decades of life and are usually asymptomatic.1,13 On CT imaging, these lesions often have a salt-and-pepper appearance.12 They are hyperintense on both T1 and T2 sequences of the MRI.12 However, spinal hemangiomas can cause focal pain and tenderness, for which medical management is recommended.13,14 Other options include kyhoplasty, vertebroplasty, and transarterial embolization.13 In patients with neurological compromise, often an intralesional or en bloc resection with stabilization surgery may be necessary.15 2. Aneurysmal Bone Cysts
Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) were first described in 1943 by Jaffe and Lichetenstein[A1].16 These lesions are expansile tumors that contain thin-walled, blood-filled cystic cavities.13 These lesions represent up to 10% of primary spinal tumors.1,17 Most lesions are diagnosed within the thoracic or lumbar spine in the first three decades of life.13,18 On CT/MRI, ABCs are cystic and lytic lesions with fluid-fluid levels.1 ABCs usually arise from the posterior elements but often invade the epidural space and pedicles, which can lead to neurological compromise and mechanical instability.18 Most ABCs grow over time.13,18 Various treatment options, including simple curettage, complete excision, radiotherapy, and embolization, are available.13,16,18 There has yet to be a consensus on optimal management of spinal ABCs. An actual en bloc resection with the ABC in one piece with a broader layer of normal tissue surrounding is challenging to achieve in aneurysmal bone cysts due to its characteristic profile.18 An intralesional piecemeal resection with bone grafting is often the surgical treatment for ABCs.13 Boriani et al showed that complete intralesional resection without any adjuvant radiation had no recurrences.19 However, partial intralesional resection is associated with high local recurrence rate. Studies by de Kleuever et al and Hay et al showed a 25% local disease progression.20,21 The majority of the recurrences occur within the first 6 to 12 months.18 Harrop et al recommend complete intralesional resection of ABCs due to incomplete removal's high local recurrence rate.18 Embolization of ABCs is associated with decreased intraoperative bleeding.13,22 A few case reports have been published supporting the isolated use of transarterial embolization to treat ABCs.19 Transarterial embolization should be considered in patients with recurrent ABCs or who cannot undergo surgery. Embolization requires a prolonged follow-up to assess the treatment outcome.18,19 Of note, risks of transarterial embolization include ischemic injury to the spinal cord and brainstem.18,23 Finally, met with megavoltage radiotherapy with 26-30 Gy for recurrent or inoperable ABCs has been shown to have up to 75% local control rates.13,24 Of note, given that the majority of the ABC patients are young, the risks associated with the treatment of radiotherapy must be carefully considered. Ideally the preferred treatment is a complete intralesional resection. 3. Osteoid Osteoma and Osteoblastoma
Osteoid osteomas and osteoblastomas are bone-forming lesions that produce osteoid and woven bone, and are often seen in long bones.12 These lesions, however, can also occur in the spine; they represent 10% of primary spinal tumors.1,12,18 Osteoid osteomas are four times more common than osteoblastomas.1,13,18 At the time of presentation, most patients are in their first decades of life, and CT shows a sclerotic nidus.1 Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastomas are often found in the posterior elements of the spine, but osteoblastomas might extend into the anterior column.18 Back or neck pain that worsens at night is the most common presenting symptom.13,25 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs often resolve the pain associated with osteoid osteoma.12,13 Another symptom associated with osteoblastoma is painful scoliosis, seen in 25-62% of patients.13,25 Treatment options for these lesions include medications, surgical resection, CT-guided laser thermocoagulation and radiofrequency ablations, and radiotherapy.13,26 While most osteoid osteomas can be managed with medical management or percutaneous treatment options, osteoblastomas often require surgical intervention, as they are more aggressive, have a higher recurrence rate, and higher potential malignant transformation.18,27 Zileli et al and Flemming et al found up to 50% recurrence rates in patients with subtotal resection of osteoblastomas.28,29 Given the high recurrence rate, en bloc resection is recommended for aggressive osteoblastomas of Enneking grade 3.18 Radiation treatment after incomplete osteoblastoma resection has not been effective in preventing recurrences.18 Additionally, chemotherapy has a minimal role in the management of osteoblastomas.13,30 Other CT-guided therapies are more suited for the management of osteomas, with CT-guided thermocoagulation having a 94% success rate.13,26 4. Chordoma
Chordoma is a slow-growing tumor originating from embryonic remnants of the notochord.12,13 Chordomas represent 4% of primary spinal tumors.1 These lesions can occur anywhere along the spinal column but are most often seen in the clivus and the sacrum.12,31 These lesions are often seen in patients in their fourth through sixth decades.1 Chordomas are more prevalent in men than women, with a 2:1 ratio.2 CT shows expansile lysis and sclerosis, while MRI shows T1 hypointensity and T2 hyperintensity with irregular contrast enhancement.2 Thirty percent of sacral chordomas progress to metastasized.32 Mukherjee et al reviewed 414 patients with chordomas. They reported a median survival of 50 months with 5-year survival of 62%.33 In comparison, 5-year survival is only 18% in patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma.33
An en bloc resection of spinal chordoma is critical in improving local recurrence rates and survival. Gokaslan et al reviewed 166 patients with spinal chordomas in the spine. They found that patients who underwent Enneking inappropriate resections had a seven times higher chance of having local recurrence compared to patients who underwent Enneking appropriate resections.35 However, attaining an en bloc resection is difficult in chordoma surgery as these lesions are slow growing and poorly develop into large tumors before diagnosis. Additionally, obtaining a wide resection with normal tissue along the surgical specimen has potential to result in considerable morbidity given the proximity of the neural elements.13 Radiation therapy has been used as an adjunct in the management of spinal chordomas. Curative dosing for chordomas at about 70Gy is higher than the tolerant dose of the spinal cord at 50Gy.13 Various strategies have been closed, including proton beam and carbon ion treatment given conventionally.35,36 Recently, a high dose single fraction radiosurgery of 24Gy given neoadjuvant or postoperatively associated with high success rates—96.3% and 89.9% local recurrence-free survival and 90% and 84.3% overall survival at 3- and 5-year periods, respectively.37
Figure 1. Chordoma image is a MRI lumbar spine T2 sagittal and MRI sacrum T1 with contrast in a 75-year-old male who was found to have a sacral chordoma on workup for low back pain.
5. Giant Cell Tumor
Giant cell tumors (GCTs) are aggressive tumors and account for about 5% of PSTs.1,18 Fifty percent of GCTs involve the sacrum, with 10% having potential for metastatic potential.2 Most commonly, GCTs occur after adolescence and before age 50.2,18 CT shows an osteolytic lesion, while MRI demonstrates a hypointense lesion in both T1 and T2 with contrast enhancement.2 The local recurrence rate for GCT is 47% in patients who underwent surgery with intralesional margins, and 0% in patients with a wide margin resection.18,38 However, currently, spinal GCTs get quite large at the time of diagnosis. This tends to limit the feasibility of an en bloc resection.13,18 GCTs are vascular lesions, and transarterial embolization of the tumor before surgical intervention should be considered.13 Of note, denosumab, a RANK ligand antibody, has significantly improved the management of giant cell tumors. Denosumab has also been shown to assist with improving surgical resection by increasing lesion fibrosis and decreasing vascularity.2 Use of denosumab has also been shown to change the stage of GCT—where an Enneking stage III lesion becomes an Enneking stage II after treatment.2,39 Finally, photon beam radiotherapy has been used in the management of GCTs. However, there is a 5-15% risk of malignant transformation to sarcoma in patients treated with radiotherapy for GCTs.2,18,38
Figure 2. Giant Cell Tumor: Image is an MRI T1 sagittal with contrast and CT C spine without contrast for a 25-year-old male who presented with neck pain, and was found to have a primary spinal tumor. Final pathology was notable for giant cell tumor.
6. Plasmacytoma/Multiple Myeloma
Plasmacytoma and multiple myeloma (MM) are B-cell lymphoid malignancies with clonal proliferation of plasma cells.2,13 These lesions account for 20-30% of PSTs1, and most commonly occur in men over 50 years of age.2 CT shows lytic lesions with osteoporosis, while MRI shows T1 hypointensity and T2 hyperintensity with contrast enhancement.2 Plasmacytoma is an isolated lesion and can progress to MM. MM is radiosensitive and radiotherapy attains up to 96% local disease control.13,40 Surgical intervention is indicated when mechanical instability is present, and even in cases with epidural compression, emergent radiosurgery can be effective.2 Of note, systemic treatment is indicated with chemotherapy for treatment of multiple myeloma.13,41 Conclusion
Primary spinal tumors represent a small subset of tumors with a low overall prevalence compared to other spinal pathologies. PSTs require a multidisciplinary approach and an appropriately performed biopsy. In most cases, the preferred surgical treatment is en bloc resection when feasible. Additionally, adjuvant and neoadjuvant options may be considered depending on the specifics of the tumor.
References
- Chi JH, Bydon A, Hsieh P, Witham T, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL. Epidemiology and demographics for primary vertebral tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2008;19(1):1-4.
- Rustagi T, Schwab JH, Iwenofu H, Mendel E. Overview of the management of primary tumors of the spine. Int J Neurosci. 2022;132(6):543-57.
- Chalamgari A, Valle D, Palau Villarreal X, et al. Vertebral Primary Bone Lesions: Review of Management Options. Curr Oncol. 2023;30(3):3064-78.
- Ciftdemir M, Kaya M, Selcuk E, Yalniz E. Tumors of the spine. World J Orthop. 2016;7(2):109-16.
- Di Lorenzo N, Nardi P, Ciappetta P, Fortuna A. Benign tumors and tumorlike conditions of the spine. Radiological features, treatment, and results. Surg Neurol. 1986;25(5):449-56.
- Sundaresan N, Rosen G, Boriani S. Primary malignant tumors of the spine. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009; 40(1):21–36.
- Domanski HA, Akerman M, Carlen B, et al. Core-needle biopsy performed by the cytopathologist: a technique to complement fine-needle aspiration of soft tissue and bone lesions. Cancer. 2005;105(4): 229–239.
- Yamazaki T, McLoughlin GS, Patel S, et al. Feasibility and safety of en bloc resection for primary spine tumors: a systematic review by the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 2009;34(22 Suppl):S31–S38.
- Hart RA, Boriani S, Biagini R, Currier B, Weinstein JN. A system for surgical staging and management of spine tumors. A clinical outcome study of giant cell tumors of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(15):1773-82; discussion 1783.
- Chan P, Boriani S, Fourney DR, et al. An assessment of the reliability of the Enneking and Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini classifications for staging of primary spinal tumors by the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(4):384-91.
- Fisher CG, Saravanja DD, Dvorak MF, et al. Surgical management of primary bone tumors of the spine: validation of an approach to enhance cure and reduce local recurrence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(10):830-6.
- Kumar N, Tan WLB, Wei W, Vellayappan BA. An overview of the tumors affecting the spine-inside to out. Neurooncol Pract. 2020;7(Suppl 1):i10-i17.
- Hsu W, Kosztowski TA, Zaidi HA, Dorsi M, Gokaslan ZL, Wolinsky JP. Multidisciplinary management of primary tumors of the vertebral column. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2009;10(1-2):107-25.
- Doppman JL, Oldfield EH, Heiss JD: Symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: treatment by means of direct intralesional injection of ethanol. Radiology. 2000; 214:341–348.
- Acosta FL, Sanai N, Chi JH, et al. Comprehensive management of symptomatic and aggressive vertebral hemangiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2008, 19:17–29.
- Jaffe HL, Lichtenstein L. Solitary unicameral bone cyst with emphasis on the roentgen picture, the pathologic appearance, and the pathogenesis. Arch Surg. 1942; 44:1004–1025.
- Dahlin DC, McLeod RA. Aneurysmal bone cyst and other nonneoplastic conditions. Skeletal Radiol. 1982;8:243–50.
- Harrop JS, Schmidt MH, Boriani S, Shaffrey CI. Aggressive "benign" primary spine neoplasms: osteoblastoma, aneurysmal bone cyst, and giant cell tumor. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(22 Suppl):S39-47.
- Boriani S, De Iure F, Campanacci L, et al. Aneurysmal bone cyst of the mobile spine: report on 41 cases. Spine. 2001;26:27–35.
- Hay MC, Paterson D, Taylor TK. Aneurysmal bone cysts of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978;60-B:406 –11.
- de Kleuver M, van der Heul RO, Veraart BE. Aneurysmal bone cyst of the spine: 31 cases and the importance of the surgical approach. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1998;7:286 –92.
- Disch SP, Grubb RL Jr, Gado MH, et al. Aneurysmal bone cyst of the cervicothoracic spine: computed tomographic evaluation of the value of preoperative embolization: case report. Neurosurgery. 1986;19: 290–3.
- Peraud A, Drake JM, Armstrong D, et al. Fatal ethibloc embolization of vertebrobasilar system following percutaneous injection into aneurysmal bone cyst of the second cervical vertebra. Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25: 1116–20.
- Biesecker JL, Marcove RC, Huvos AG, Mike V. Aneurysmal bone cysts. A clinicopathologic study of 66 cases. Cancer. 1970, 26:615–625
- Lundeen MA, Herring JA: Osteoid-osteoma of the spine: sclerosis in two levels. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980, 62:476–478.
- Aschero A, Gorincour G, Glard Y, et al. Percutaneous treatment of osteoid osteoma by laser thermoco- agulation under computed tomography guidance in pediatric patients. Eur Radiol. 2009; 19:679–686
- Dorfman HD, Weiss SW. Borderline osteoblastic tumors: problems in the differential diagnosis of aggressive osteoblastoma and low-grade osteosarcoma. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1984;1:215–34.
- Zileli M, Cagli S, Basdemir G, et al. Osteoid osteomas and osteoblastomas of the spine. Neurosurg Focus. 2003;15:E5.
- Flemming DJ, Murphey MD, Carmichael BB, et al. Primary tumors of the spine. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2000;4:299–320.
- Berberoglu S, Oguz A, Aribal E, Ataoglu O: Osteoblastoma response to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1997; 28:305–309.
- Erdem E, Angtuaco EC, Van Hemert R, Park JS, Al-Mefty O. Comprehensive review of intracranial chordoma. Radiographics. 2003;23(4):995–1009.
- York JE, Kaczaraj A, Abi-Said D, et al. Sacral chordoma: 40-year experience at a major cancer center. Neurosurgery. 1999; 44:74–79.
- Mukherjee D, Chaichana KL, Adogwa O, et al. Association of extent of local tumor invasion and survival in patients with malignant primary osseous spinal neoplasms from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database. World Neurosurg. 2011;76(6):580-5.
- Gokaslan ZL, Zadnik PL, Sciubba DM, et al. Mobile spine chordoma: results of 166 patients from the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(4):644-51.
- Imai R, Kamada T, Tsuji H, et al. Effect of carbon ion radiotherapy for sacral chordoma: results of Phase I-II and Phase II clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77(5):1470-6.
- Banfield W, Ioakeim-Ioannidou M, Goldberg S, et al. Definitive high-dose, proton-based radiation for unresected mobile spine and sacral chordomas. Radiother Oncol. 2022;171:139-45.
- Jin CJ, Berry-Candelario J, Reiner AS, et al. Long-term outcomes of high-dose single-fraction radiosurgery for chordomas of the spine and sacrum. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019; Oct 18;1-10.
- Leggon RE, Zlotecki R, Reith J, et al. Giant cell tumor of the pelvis and sacrum: 17 cases and analysis of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;423:196–207.
- Agarwal MG, Gundavda MK, Gupta R, et al. Does denosumab change the giant cell tumor treatment strategy? Lessons learned from early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(9):1773–1782.
- Soutar R, Lucraft H, Reece A, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of solitary plasmacytoma of bone and solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma. Clin Oncol. 2004;16:405–413.
- Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, et al. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. NEJM. 1999;341:1565–1571.
- Enneking WF. A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;(204):9-24.
Author Disclosures
M Patel: Nothing to disclose
R Mauria: Nothing to disclose
MK Kasliwal: Nothing to disclose